By Open Chronicle News Desk
Israel has announced that it will close Britain’s consulate in East Jerusalem after the United Kingdom joined France, Canada and other countries in imposing restrictions on trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, opening one of the most serious diplomatic disputes between London and Israel in recent years.
The confrontation escalated on Tuesday after British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband accused the Israeli government of turning a “blind eye” to what he described as “ethnic cleansing” by violent settlers in the West Bank.
Britain announced a ban on imports from Israeli settlements and restrictions preventing companies from providing services connected with settlement activity. France and Canada announced similar measures as a wider group of governments warned that continuing settlement expansion threatens the possibility of establishing a viable Palestinian state.
Israel strongly rejected the accusations and responded with a series of diplomatic measures, including the closure of the British consulate in East Jerusalem and restrictions targeting British officials and cooperation programmes.
Britain targets settlement economy
Miliband told Parliament that Britain would prohibit imports of goods originating in Israeli settlements in the occupied territories.
The measures go beyond physical products.
British companies will also be prevented from providing certain services supporting settlements, including financing, construction, infrastructure, real estate and advertising.
“I do not believe the British people want us supporting the occupation by accepting products from settlements in our shops and supermarkets,” Miliband said.
The economic consequences for Israel are expected to be relatively limited.
Settlement exports represent only a small proportion of overall Israeli trade and largely consist of agricultural products such as dates, citrus fruit, herbs and wine.
The political significance, however, is considerably greater. The measures represent another indication of growing international pressure on Netanyahu’s government over settlement expansion and the situation in the West Bank.
Israel closes British consulate
Israel responded by announcing the closure of Britain’s consulate in East Jerusalem.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar also said Britain would no longer be permitted to participate in a United States led coordination mission for Gaza operating in Israel.
British involvement in training Palestinian Authority security forces in the West Bank will also be terminated.
Saar condemned London’s actions as “morally distorted” and accused Britain of interfering in Israeli affairs.
He also rejected Miliband’s allegations as “outrageous lies.”
The diplomatic retaliation demonstrates how a dispute initially centred on settlements is expanding into broader security and political cooperation between the two countries.
Jeremy Corbyn among 12 Britons barred by Israel
Israel has also announced that 12 British nationals will be refused entry into the country.
Among them is former British prime minister and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a prominent supporter of Palestinian rights and outspoken critic of Israeli policy.
Zarah Sultana, who joined Corbyn in leaving Labour to establish the left wing Your Party, is also included.
Labour MP Diane Abbott is another name on the Israeli list.
Corbyn, meanwhile, argued that Britain’s settlement sanctions did not go far enough. He called for an end to arms sales and military cooperation with Israel, as well as wider measures against policies he described as sustaining occupation and apartheid.
Netanyahu vows to proceed with E1
Despite growing international pressure, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to continue settlement construction.
Particular concern surrounds the E1 development plan, approved by Israel last year after being frozen for decades.
The project would involve approximately 1,200 housing units in a strategically sensitive area between East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Critics argue that construction there would further separate East Jerusalem from Palestinian communities in the West Bank and make the territorial continuity required for a future Palestinian state considerably more difficult.
Israeli settlements in occupied territory are widely regarded as illegal under international law, a position rejected by Israel.
Netanyahu has shown no indication that the new sanctions will persuade his government to reverse the E1 decision.
France, Britain and Canada warn of threat to two state solution
French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a joint warning about the direction of Israeli policy in the West Bank.
“Systematic settlement expansion in the West Bank, including the Government of Israel’s latest decision to progress the E1 settlement, as well as the dramatic increase in settler violence, pose a direct and urgent threat to that vision for peace,” they said.
Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand reinforced that position, arguing that settlement expansion undermines the possibility of achieving a negotiated two state settlement while also addressing Israel’s legitimate security concerns.
France cited what it called the “frenzied expansion” of settlements and an increase in violence as reasons for adopting additional measures.
Britain, France and Canada were joined by foreign ministers from 10 other countries in reaffirming support for a negotiated two state solution.
Denmark, Norway, Poland, Spain and Sweden were among the countries associated with the initiative.
The Netherlands, Ireland, Belgium, Spain and Norway have already banned settlement goods or are moving toward restrictions, according to the British government. Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden have indicated support for additional action.
Washington rejects sanctions approach
The United States has taken a different position.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington would not join Britain, France and Canada in blocking settlement imports.
Rubio warned that the sanctions themselves could prove destabilising for the West Bank.
The disagreement illustrates an increasingly visible division between Washington and several close Western allies over how to respond to settlement expansion.
While European and Canadian governments are moving toward economic pressure, the Trump administration remains opposed to the sanctions strategy.
Settlement violence intensifies international pressure
The diplomatic confrontation comes amid growing concern over violence involving Israeli settlers and Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.
For Britain and the governments supporting the sanctions, the issue is no longer simply the existence of settlements but the pace of their expansion and the associated violence.
Miliband’s use of the term “ethnic cleansing” represents an unusually severe accusation from a senior British official against the Israeli government.
Israel categorically rejects that characterization.
The language nevertheless demonstrates how dramatically relations have deteriorated as the Gaza war and developments in the West Bank reshape Israel’s relationships with several traditional Western partners.
Sanctions are economically modest but politically significant
The immediate commercial consequences of the import restrictions are unlikely to cause substantial damage to the Israeli economy.
Israel’s broader trade with Britain, France and Canada is far larger than the relatively small volume of goods produced in West Bank settlements.
But economic impact is not necessarily the principal objective.
By distinguishing between Israel itself and goods produced in settlements, participating governments are attempting to increase pressure specifically on the settlement project while reaffirming their support for Israel alongside a future Palestinian state.
The measures could become more consequential if additional countries join them or if restrictions eventually expand into investment, financial services or other economic sectors.
A widening diplomatic rupture
The closure of Britain’s East Jerusalem consulate gives the dispute a significance extending beyond trade.
Britain has maintained a diplomatic presence in Jerusalem for generations, and the consulate has played an important role in London’s relations with Palestinians.
Closing it therefore represents a major Israeli response.
Combined with restrictions on British nationals, the termination of security cooperation programmes and the exclusion of Britain from Gaza coordination mechanisms, the dispute is becoming a broader diplomatic rupture.
Neither side currently appears willing to retreat.
Netanyahu has pledged to continue settlement construction, while Britain, France, Canada and their partners are presenting their measures as necessary to preserve what they see as the rapidly diminishing possibility of a two state solution.
The confrontation illustrates a larger transformation taking place around Israel. The consequences of the Gaza war and accelerating settlement expansion are increasingly affecting relations with governments that have traditionally been among Israel’s closest Western partners.
The settlement trade bans may have only modest immediate economic consequences. Their political message, and Israel’s unusually forceful retaliation, suggest the diplomatic consequences could be considerably greater.
Explore International Relations
Discover more reporting and analysis on diplomacy, international security, global governance and the changing balance of power.
Return to International Relations →